Android doesn't kill sideloading, but the compromise is perfect

Sideloading has been a staple of Android since the beginning, not only giving Android a lot of flexibility, but also a sense of openness and freedom. The community panicked (somewhat understandably) after Google announced major changes to sideloading, but now that Google has laid out exactly how the new sideloading flow will work on Android, I’m not only happy to see sideloading never go away, but Google’s compromise is as close to perfect as I think we can reasonably get.

This edition of 9to5Google Weekender is part of 9to5Google’s relaunched newsletter, highlighting the biggest Google stories with additional commentary and other news. Register here to get it to your inbox early!

“Android Developer Verification” has been called by some the death of Android’s open nature. Google announced the change last year requires developers to register with Google to allow apps to be installed on Android devices, including restrictions on sideloading. Google originally pitched it as an ID check at the airport – confirming who the app is “from”.

The focus here is always on combating fraud, including “credible” fake apps, as well as reducing widespread malware and other malicious attacks, especially through side-loading from sources outside of the Google Play Store. Google has been It targets cheats on Android more aggressive over the years to certain successpartly by blocking sideloaded programs used in scams.

Advertisement – Swipe for more content

this week, Google has finally revealed a new “advanced stream”. This is designed to allow users (and developers) to sideload applications that are not from a registered developer.

The 4-step process asks the user to confirm that “no one instructed me” and then begins a 24-hour delay. The user is asked to restart their device to start the timer, and after 24 hours they can continue the sideloading process once again acknowledging the risks – if you choose to stay open “indefinitely”, the delay only starts once. So really, it’s just a one-time hurdle. The biggest “headache” is that you need to enable developer options, but you can then turn them off.

Google will introduce this to all versions of Android starting in August 2026.

And in my eyes, it’s the perfect compromise.

Google has repeatedly made it clear that the “cleanup” of sideloading is not about removing functionality or freedom, it has always been about user protection and, above all, closing down cheats that are widespread on Android in some regions. By restricting sideloading as planned, Google isn’t stopping developers or even users from doing what they really want to do, but it’s a big wall against cheaters.

Scammers often rely on time pressure to create a sense of urgency. A 24 hour waiting period with a few extra warnings? This is a tough deterrent against this kind of fraud. It’s also a big hassle for users going through more common scams. A personal example – a family member called me a few weeks ago asking why the home screen had changed after buying a cheap fitness tracker. Apparently, the product required them to sideload an unknown program that replaces the launcher. I talked about deleting them, but the 24 hour delay and all those extra warning screens? The installation would never happen.

It’s a thoughtful way to balance user protection along with functionality. Because while the “average Joe” has to wait for the 24-hour period to expire, developers and hobbyists who need/want to download apps immediately can still use it conventional ADB tools. This is a hassle for “normal” users – and even more so for fraudsters – but people who really can’t wait for the 24-hour period (again, it only needs to be once) still have options.

And let’s not forget that in many cases you won’t be dealing with it anyway. Google’s developer verification program simply requires developers to sign up, making sideloading a non-issue with no wait times or anything else “in the way”.

What do you think of Google’s changes to Android sideloading? I’m sure there are many who still have a problem with this, but as mentioned, I’m not sure there’s a better compromise out there. It could be worse.

This Week’s Top Stories

The Galaxy Z TriFold is now dead

Samsung has confirmed that it is discontinuing the Galaxy Z TriFold after a few months. The reason? Samsung didn’t say but offers a report This leads to complex manufacturing and increased pressure of RAM/storage shortages.