Brussels has decided that endless drift is a threat, not a feature. The European Commission on Friday told Meta to scrap design tricks that keep people glued to Facebook and Instagram or risk fines that could run into the billions in a new set of charges under the EU’s Digital Services Act.
The commission’s preliminary findings accuse Meta of building two platforms to attract users and of underestimating the risks the design poses to their physical and mental health, particularly to children and vulnerable adults. This is the latest twist dependency design probe It has been under construction for more than a year.
The regulator was unusually specific about what it wanted to change. Meta should deprecate features like autoplay and infinite scrolling, introduce effective screen breaks, and realign their recommendation systems so they’re less relentlessly targeting engagement.
Underneath the demand is a complaint about choice. The commission said Meta offers time management tools in its apps, but they are too easily disabled, dismissed or technically awkward to use, leaving a default experience designed for maximum focus rather than user well-being.
💜 of EU technology
The latest rumblings from the EU tech scene, a story from our wise founder Boris and some questionable AI art. Free in your inbox every week. Register now!
The move is based on a previous finding. Brussels had already charged Meta Cannot keep children under 13 away Facebook and Instagram and Friday’s indictments expand the case, from who is on the platforms to how the platforms are set up to keep them there.
The mechanism is the bloc’s Digital Services Act content and safety rules book for large platforms that require the largest services to identify and mitigate what it calls system risks. Dependency by design is one of those in the Commission’s reading.
Central to this is what officials call the “rabbit hole” effect, where a personalized feed continues to serve up content well past the point at which a young user wants to stop paying attention. The Commission’s argument is that the harm is not accidental but structural and shows how products are designed to reward time spent.
Shares are determined by the same law. If the findings are upheld after Meta responded, the company could face fines of up to 6% of its annual worldwide turnover, amounting to billions of dollars in recent revenues, although actual EU penalties tend to fall well below that ceiling.
This is not a final decision yet. The charges are preliminary and Meta may respond to the Commission’s decision in the coming months, a process that could drag on and leave room for the company to offer solutions rather than simply writing a check.
Meta’s response was measured, but unrelenting. The company said it disagreed with the findings, while promising to “engage constructively” with the Commission, a firm’s familiar position that means objecting to the article without contradicting the regulator.
The case follows a wider European shift to protect children online age-based social media protection At the top of the Commission, it spurred a number of national actions among member states. Where regulators are paying attention, it’s increasingly design over content.
This change is what takes the case beyond the Meta. If Brussels can force a platform to turn off autoplay and soften its algorithm by default, it sets a template that reaches every major service built on the same engagement mechanics, from short video apps to feeds far beyond Facebook and Instagram.
For now, the order is more of a request than a done deal, and the features it targets remain open. But the Commission named what it wanted to disappear and added a number to the cost of keeping it.
