The research repository ArXiv will ban authors for a year if they outsource all work to artificial intelligence


ArXivA widely used open repository for preprint research is doing more to counter the indiscriminate use of large language models in scientific articles.

Although articles are posted on the site before they are peer-reviewed, arXiv (pronounced “archive”) has become one of the main ways to disseminate research in fields such as computer science and mathematics, and the site itself is a source of information about trends in scientific research.

ArXiv has already taken steps to combat the growing number of low-quality, AI-generated papers, for example by requiring the submission of posters for the first time. get confirmation from the identified author. After being hosted by Cornell for more than 20 years, the organization is becoming an independent nonprofit organization, and that should allow it. Collect more coins to solve problems like AI slop.

In his latest move, Thomas Ditterich — chair of arXiv’s computer science division — placed on Thursday “If there is incontrovertible evidence in the submission that the authors did not verify the results of the LLM creation, that means we cannot trust anything in the paper.”

Dietterich said this irrefutable evidence could include things like “hallucinated references” and comments from or about LLM. If such evidence is found, the paper’s authors face “a 1-year ban from arXiv, followed by a requirement that subsequent arXiv submissions be accepted by a peer-reviewed venue first.”

Note that this is not an outright ban on the use of LLMs, but rather, as Ditterich puts it, a requirement that authors take “full responsibility” for content “regardless of how the content was created.” Thus, researchers are still responsible if they copy and paste “inappropriate language, plagiarized content, biased content, mistakes, errors, misreferences, or misleading content” directly from the LLM.

Ditterich This was reported to 404 Media that it would be a “one strike” rule, but moderators would have to flag the issue and section chairs would have to approve the evidence before imposing a penalty. Authors will also be able to appeal the decision.

It was found out as a result of recent research fictional citations are on the rise in biomedical research, probably because of LLMs – to be fair, it’s not just scientists who get hired Using AI generated quotes.

When you purchase through links in our articles, we may earn a small commission. This does not affect our editorial independence.



Source link

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *